<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Functional Packages, Part 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/liqueur/functional-packages-part-4/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/liqueur/functional-packages-part-4?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=functional-packages-part-4</link>
	<description>Distilling a million label approvals down to the ones that affect you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/liqueur/functional-packages-part-4/comment-page-1#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/?p=3335#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s clear that it&#039;s a liqueur/distilled spirit, not a malt beverage (see box 5 on the approval). But it&#039;s not clear whether all or most of the flavor and color was in the &quot;patented twist cap.&quot; There is only one formula approval showing at box 10, and there probably should be two (as on this approval for another product with more than one &quot;chamber&quot;:  http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/dss/twistee-rules-aggregate-packaging).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s clear that it&#8217;s a liqueur/distilled spirit, not a malt beverage (see box 5 on the approval). But it&#8217;s not clear whether all or most of the flavor and color was in the &#8220;patented twist cap.&#8221; There is only one formula approval showing at box 10, and there probably should be two (as on this approval for another product with more than one &#8220;chamber&#8221;:  <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/dss/twistee-rules-aggregate-packaging" rel="nofollow">http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/dss/twistee-rules-aggregate-packaging</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Sarwark</title>
		<link>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/liqueur/functional-packages-part-4/comment-page-1#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Sarwark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/?p=3335#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>Are the bottle contents just a neutral malt beverage with all the flavors in the cap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the bottle contents just a neutral malt beverage with all the flavors in the cap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

