<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bevlog &#124; beer, wine, spirits trends &#124; beverage blog &#187; caffeine/secondary effects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/tag/caffeine-secondary-effects/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog</link>
	<description>Distilling a million label approvals down to the ones that affect you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rhonda’s Fight to Save Moonshot</title>
		<link>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/rhondas-fight-to-save-moonshot?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rhondas-fight-to-save-moonshot</link>
		<comments>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/rhondas-fight-to-save-moonshot#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 10:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[flavored malt beverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caffeine/secondary effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/?p=5411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox and Reason have a good video about the recent brewhaha over beer with caffeine. The video features John Stossel, Nick Gillespie, and Rhonda Kallman (owner of Moonshot, Beer with Caffeine). Among the highlights: Rhonda says FDA&#8217;s ban is &#8220;clearly a case of the government over-reaching. &#8230; My Moonshot Beer is nothing like these Four [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script src="http://reason.tv/embed/video.php?id=1597" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<p>Fox and <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2011/01/13/reasoner-on-stossel-nick-gille">Reason</a> have a good video about the recent brewhaha over <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/fda-and-ftc-banish-four-loko-and-joose">beer with caffeine</a>.</p>
<p>The video features John Stossel, Nick Gillespie, and Rhonda Kallman (owner of <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/moonshot.pdf">Moonshot</a>, Beer with Caffeine). Among the highlights:</p>
<p>Rhonda says FDA&#8217;s ban is &#8220;clearly a case of the government over-reaching. &#8230; My Moonshot Beer is nothing like these Four Loko drinks.&#8221; FDA:</p>
<blockquote><p>didn&#8217;t fully research it &#8230; they put the onus on the small entrepreneur to have a scientist. &#8230; It&#8217;s 5% alcohol by volume and less than a half a cup of coffee of natural caffeine. It&#8217;s a great combination. &#8230; They won&#8217;t stop here. Where will they stop?</p></blockquote>
<p>Sen. Schumer won&#8217;t stop at calling these drinks a &#8220;blackout in a can.&#8221; He goes further to suggest they may be a death wish in a can. And <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2011/01/14/iowa-legislator-seeks-to-crimi">here</a>, Iowa takes a step toward going much, much further (toward banning any mixture of cola, coffee or Red Bull with alcohol, at bars and restaurants).</p>
<p>Near the end of the video, Rhonda points to her <a href="http://www.moonshotbeer.com/Moonshotbeer.com/The_Petition.html">petition</a> to save Moonshot. She seeks to distinguish it from the circa-2010 Crunk, Four Loko and Joose products, and <a href="http://www.moonshotbeer.com/Moonshotbeer.com/All_Systems_Go.html">explains</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>For the time being, Moonshot has ceased production due to [the FDA ban]. &#8230; Three of the products targeted are high alcohol, high caffeine and high sugar &#8220;juice&#8221; drinks sold in oversized 23.5 ounce cans and targeted to underage drinkers. The fourth was Moonshot ’69 – an all malt, craft-brewed pilsner beer that bears absolutely no resemblance to these high alcohol, high caffeine sugary drinks. &#8230; There is nothing new about adults combining caffeine and alcohol. Who hasn’t enjoyed a rum and Coke, Irish coffee, Kahlua or espresso martini? The question should be what levels are appropriate.</p></blockquote>

	<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/fda-and-ftc-banish-four-loko-and-joose" title="FDA and FTC Banish Four Loko and Joose (November 17, 2010)">FDA and FTC Banish Four Loko and Joose</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/sparks-and-caffeine-nearly-extinguished" title="Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished (December 18, 2008)">Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished</a> (8)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/ws/ttb-not-ok-with-vitamin-wine" title="TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine (December 11, 2009)">TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine</a> (3)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/rhondas-fight-to-save-moonshot/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA and FTC Banish Four Loko and Joose</title>
		<link>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/fda-and-ftc-banish-four-loko-and-joose?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fda-and-ftc-banish-four-loko-and-joose</link>
		<comments>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/fda-and-ftc-banish-four-loko-and-joose#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alcohol beverages generally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flavored malt beverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caffeine/secondary effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legally interesting/controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/?p=5227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a massive and coordinated action yesterday, the Federal Government moved to favor Red Bull and pummel other drinks with caffeine. FDA handed a giant gift to Red Bull here. The FTC handed a humongous present to Red Bull here. Other actions are expected imminently, as legions of other regulators rush in to exaggerate the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a massive and coordinated action yesterday, the Federal Government moved to favor Red Bull and pummel other drinks with caffeine.</p>
<p>FDA handed a giant gift to Red Bull <a href="http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/ucm234023.htm">here</a>.</p>
<p>The FTC handed a humongous present to Red Bull <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2010/11/alcohol.shtm">here</a>.</p>
<p>Other actions are expected imminently, as legions of other regulators rush in to <a href="http://neptune.observer.com/2010/politics/schumer-hops-four-loko-ban-wagon">exaggerate the dangers</a> (it looks like soda, it&#8217;s &#8220;loaded with caffeine,&#8221; it&#8217;s like a &#8220;plague&#8221; and &#8220;toxic&#8221;) and ignore <a href="http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fcn/gras_notices/GRN000347.pdf">evidence</a> to the contrary. This follows many state actions in recent weeks. Presto, problem solved! We eagerly await the evidence that young people cut back on alcohol, or cut back on co-consumption of  alcohol with caffeine. We hope it&#8217;s better than the current <a href="http://www.marininstitute.org/site/images/stories/pdfs/caffeinated_cocktails_aempdf_final.pdf">leading study</a>; it purports to highlight the dangers of the pre-mixed products such as Four Loko, Liquid Charge, Joose and <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/news-caffeine.php#caflist">scores of others</a> &#8212; without ever having examined any such products. Instead, the O&#8217;Brien study reviewed products so different they are not even within the scope of yesterday&#8217;s governmental actions (none of which, after some dexterous sleight of hand and misdirection, stopped it from instigating the above actions).</p>
<p>We believe caffeine and alcohol raise plenty of important public policy issues, whether they are combined or not, and they warrant serious deliberation. But many of the deliberations so far reflect political pressures more than an even-handed review.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">November 18, 2010 Update</span>:  TTB lands another blow, against caffeine added to alcohol beverages, <a href="http://www.ttb.gov/main_pages/caffeine-added.shtml">here</a>.</p>

	<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/sparks-and-caffeine-nearly-extinguished" title="Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished (December 18, 2008)">Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished</a> (8)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/rhondas-fight-to-save-moonshot" title="Rhonda’s Fight to Save Moonshot (January 16, 2011)">Rhonda’s Fight to Save Moonshot</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/ws/ttb-not-ok-with-vitamin-wine" title="TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine (December 11, 2009)">TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine</a> (3)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/fda-and-ftc-banish-four-loko-and-joose/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jakk&#8217;d</title>
		<link>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/dss/jakkd?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=jakkd</link>
		<comments>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/dss/jakkd#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 12:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[distilled spirits specialty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caffeine/secondary effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legally interesting/controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/?p=4296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can learn a lot from this Jakk&#8217;d label: It is one of very few that mentions the amount of caffeine on the label. This is probably a good thing. It is hard to imagine a good argument for disallowing a short, plain statement as to how much of a powerful psychoactive substance is in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/jakkd.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4298" title="jakkd" src="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/jakkd.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="417" /></a></p>
<p>We can learn a lot from <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/jakkd.pdf">this Jakk&#8217;d label</a>:</p>
<ol>
<li>It is one of very few that mentions the amount of caffeine on the label. This is probably a good thing. It is hard to imagine a good argument for disallowing a short, plain statement as to how much of a powerful psychoactive substance is in the beverage you are about to consume. This product has 75 mg. of caffeine per bottle, according to the label. It might be even better if the label used an icon or other simple statement to show that this is <a href="http://www.energyfiend.com/the-caffeine-database">roughly equivalent to a cup of coffee</a>.</li>
<li>According to box 19, the brand name does not refer to anything nefarious, and instead refers to the name of the company&#8217;s founder, and other good things like &#8220;cool,&#8221; &#8220;thorough enjoyment,&#8221; and &#8220;being pumped about the greatness of this drink.&#8221; TTB is not so sure, and noted that &#8220;The brand name remains under review.&#8221;</li>
<li>This is a rare spirits label with an FDA-style ingredient list.</li>
</ol>
<p>Jakk&#8217;d is made in Temperance, Michigan.</p>

	<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/ws/ttb-not-ok-with-vitamin-wine" title="TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine (December 11, 2009)">TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/sparks-and-caffeine-nearly-extinguished" title="Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished (December 18, 2008)">Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished</a> (8)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/is-it-tilt-without-caffeine" title="Is it Tilt without Caffeine? (December 11, 2008)">Is it Tilt without Caffeine?</a> (3)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/dss/jakkd/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Igniting a Controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/igniting-a-controversy?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=igniting-a-controversy</link>
		<comments>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/igniting-a-controversy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[flavored malt beverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caffeine/secondary effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legally interesting/controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statement of composition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/?p=3755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Sparks label may well be the label that ignited a big controversy, coming to a boil eight years later. As near as we can tell, it is the first or one of the very first label approvals showing the direct addition of caffeine. Since then, TTB has approved hundreds or thousands of labels with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/holty.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3762" title="holty" src="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/holty-500x407.jpg" alt="holty" width="500" height="407" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sparks.pdf">This Sparks label</a> may well be the label that ignited a big controversy, coming to a boil eight years later. As near as we can tell, it<a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sparks.pdf"></a> is the first or one of the very first label approvals showing the direct addition of caffeine. Since then, TTB has approved hundreds or thousands of labels with a similar caffeine-alcohol combination as per this <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/news-caffeine.php#caflist">list</a>, as explained <a href="http://www.ttb.gov/newsletters/archives/2009/ttb_newsletter111809-special.html">by TTB here</a>. Beginning about two years ago, <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/files/caffeine/complaint_millercoors.pdf">CSPI</a> began vigorously challenging caffeine-alcohol combination, and then the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124779531662955515.html">states</a> and the <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0923035/index.shtm">FTC</a> jumped in. In November of 2009 <a href="http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodIngredientsPackaging/ucm190366.htm">FDA</a> said the drinks probably should not be allowed. <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/sparks-and-caffeine-nearly-extinguished">Caffeinated Sparks is gone</a>, but the controversy burns on.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/holty.pdf">Holty&#8217;s Cyclone</a> is a much earlier approval, and contains at least two sources of caffeine &#8212; but it does not have the directly-added caffeine that makes the 2001 Sparks approval noteworthy. Holty&#8217;s is beer with added ginseng, guarana and kola nut. It is quite amazing that Holty&#8217;s has an image of a doctor examining the beer and seeming to approve, along with a reference to Dr. Holty. It is also surprising that the product lacks anything resembling a modern statement of composition. The terms are all over the place, from lager to herbs to the stimulants.</p>

	<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/ws/ttb-not-ok-with-vitamin-wine" title="TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine (December 11, 2009)">TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/sparks-and-caffeine-nearly-extinguished" title="Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished (December 18, 2008)">Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished</a> (8)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/dss/jakkd" title="Jakk&#8217;d (May 4, 2010)">Jakk&#8217;d</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/igniting-a-controversy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine</title>
		<link>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/ws/ttb-not-ok-with-vitamin-wine?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ttb-not-ok-with-vitamin-wine</link>
		<comments>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/ws/ttb-not-ok-with-vitamin-wine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wine specialty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caffeine/secondary effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ingredients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legally interesting/controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-liquid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/?p=3735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Controversy in a cup. This little shooter raises a lot of TTB issues. First of all, it&#8217;s a gel-shot and those can be controversial from time to time. Next, it is technically a wine but it has added spirits &#8212; in the form of citrus neutral spirits (vodka, for all intents and purposes) and flavors. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/nrg.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3737" title="nrg" src="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/nrg.jpg" alt="nrg" width="500" height="278" /></a></p>
<p>Controversy in a cup. <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/nrg.pdf">This little shooter</a> raises a lot of TTB issues. First of all, it&#8217;s a gel-shot and those can be controversial from time to time. Next, it is technically a wine but it has added spirits &#8212; in the form of citrus neutral spirits (vodka, for all intents and purposes) and flavors. But wait, there&#8217;s more. It contains caffeine. It contains taurine. And &#8230; it contains added vitamins, in the form of Vitamin B6 and B12 (pyridoxine and cyanocobalamin).</p>
<p>Not too surprisingly, this 2006 gem of an approval is also &#8220;surrendered&#8221; (see about halfway down the form).</p>
<p>As of this writing, TTB does not allow vitamins to be directly added to <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/alcohol-beverages-generally/beer-with-vitamins">beer</a>, wine or spirits. Until recent months, TTB allowed vitamins to be added so long as their was no direct reference to the vitamins on the label or in advertising. TTB is at the early stages of developing <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.regulations.gov');" href="http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic//component/main?main=UnifiedAgenda&amp;agency=TREAS&amp;pubperiod=200810&amp;rin=1513-AB60">regulations related to alcohol beverages containing vitamins</a>, minerals and caffeine.</p>

	<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/sparks-and-caffeine-nearly-extinguished" title="Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished (December 18, 2008)">Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished</a> (8)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/energy-beer" title="Energy Beer (August 3, 2009)">Energy Beer</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/dss/serving-facts-on-bacardi-island-breeze" title="Serving Facts on Bacardi Island Breeze (March 10, 2009)">Serving Facts on Bacardi Island Breeze</a> (1)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/ws/ttb-not-ok-with-vitamin-wine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Energy Not Allowed</title>
		<link>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/malt-beverage/energy-not-allowed?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=energy-not-allowed</link>
		<comments>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/malt-beverage/energy-not-allowed#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[malt beverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caffeine/secondary effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legally interesting/controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/?p=3156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can Google &#8220;energy vodka&#8221; or &#8220;energy beer&#8221; and find millions of links in each case. But you won&#8217;t find much by way of references to &#8220;energy&#8221; on TTB-regulated labels. TTB seems to be dead-set against allowing this term, almost without regard to the context. Edison Light Beer illustrates this. The product does not even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/edison.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3173" title="edison" src="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/edison.jpg" alt="edison" width="500" height="518" /></a></p>
<p>You can Google &#8220;energy vodka&#8221; or &#8220;energy beer&#8221; and find millions of links in each case. But you won&#8217;t find much by way of references to &#8220;energy&#8221; on TTB-regulated labels. TTB seems to be dead-set against allowing this term, almost without regard to the context. Edison Light Beer illustrates this. The product does not even contain caffeine or other stimulants. The label does, however, make a passing reference to &#8220;energy,&#8221; saying:  &#8220;Edison brings new energy to light.&#8221; Or at least it did. TTB banished the term in this <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/edison2007.pdf">March 2007 temporary approval</a>. By the time of this <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/edison2008.pdf">March 2008 replacement approval</a>, Edison&#8217;s energy was dissipated without a trace.</p>

	<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/malt-beverage/ugly-american-beer" title="Ugly American Beer (November 21, 2008)">Ugly American Beer</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/ws/ttb-not-ok-with-vitamin-wine" title="TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine (December 11, 2009)">TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/sparks-and-caffeine-nearly-extinguished" title="Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished (December 18, 2008)">Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished</a> (8)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/malt-beverage/energy-not-allowed/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caffeine:  It&#8217;s Not Just for Beer and Coffee Liqueur Anymore</title>
		<link>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/ws/caffeine-its-not-just-for-beer-and-coffee-liqueur-anymore?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=caffeine-its-not-just-for-beer-and-coffee-liqueur-anymore</link>
		<comments>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/ws/caffeine-its-not-just-for-beer-and-coffee-liqueur-anymore#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wine specialty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caffeine/secondary effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legally interesting/controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/?p=3117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TTB has been allowing caffeine in alcohol beverages since the day it became TTB, and ATF allowed it for decades prior. At first, it was most often found in things like coffee liqueur. Then it jumped to beer about eight years ago (with this Sparks label that seems to be the earliest beer with caffeine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/chiang.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3128" title="chiang" src="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/chiang.jpg" alt="chiang" width="400" height="669" /></a></p>
<p>TTB has been allowing caffeine in alcohol beverages since the day it became TTB, and ATF allowed it for decades prior. At first, it was most often found in things like coffee liqueur.</p>
<p>Then it jumped to beer about eight years ago (with this <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/sparksignition.pdf">Sparks label</a> that seems to be the earliest beer with caffeine approval, and one of the first with directly added caffeine &#8212; in beer, wine or spirits).</p>
<p>Well it took a while, but our favorite alkaloid has finally made the jump to wine. So far, we find at least four wines with clear evidence of caffeine. They are:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/cafelue.pdf">Cafe Lue Orange Wine with Coffee</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/chiang.pdf">Chang Rai Green Tea Wine</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/charbay.pdf">Charbay Aperitif Wine with Tea Leaves</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/pinksake.pdf">P.I.N.K. Sake with Caffeine</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Somehow I don&#8217;t imagine the skateboard crowd getting crazy with Charbay Aperitif Wine or P.I.N.K. Sake. A list of more than sixty approvals, for alcohol beverages with caffeine, is <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/news-caffeine.php">here</a>.</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">Charbay Aperitif Wine with Tea Leaves</div>

	<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/ws/ttb-not-ok-with-vitamin-wine" title="TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine (December 11, 2009)">TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/sparks-and-caffeine-nearly-extinguished" title="Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished (December 18, 2008)">Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished</a> (8)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/dss/jakkd" title="Jakk&#8217;d (May 4, 2010)">Jakk&#8217;d</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/ws/caffeine-its-not-just-for-beer-and-coffee-liqueur-anymore/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Energy Beer</title>
		<link>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/energy-beer?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=energy-beer</link>
		<comments>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/energy-beer#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[flavored malt beverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caffeine/secondary effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ingredients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legally interesting/controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/?p=2994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TTB is not likely to allow anything labeled as &#8220;energy beer&#8221; anytime soon. But that doesn&#8217;t mean there is any shortage of beer tinged with caffeine. Notwithstanding the demise of Sparks and Tilt, there is a big upsurge in beers with added caffeine, guarana, tea, yerba mate &#8212; and coffee. Today, coffee. Pipeline Porter is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2998" title="coffee" src="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/coffee.jpg" alt="coffee" width="500" height="179" /></p>
<p>TTB is not likely to allow anything labeled as &#8220;energy beer&#8221; anytime soon. But that doesn&#8217;t mean there is any shortage of beer tinged with caffeine. Notwithstanding the demise of <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/sparks-and-caffeine-nearly-extinguished">Sparks and Tilt</a>, there is a big upsurge in beers with added caffeine, guarana, <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/mass-customization-tons-of-twisted-tea">tea</a>, <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/malt-beverage/yerba-mate">yerba mate</a> &#8212; and coffee. Today, coffee.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/pipeline.pdf">Pipeline Porter</a> is made with 100% Hawaiian Kona Coffee according to the label.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/joe.pdf">Joe</a> is brewed with coffee, by Philadelphia Brewing Company of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/yeti.pdf">Yeti</a> is stout aged on oak chips with coffee added. The front label pretty much suggests serving it with breakfast.</p>
<p>None of these labels mention energy, stimulants, caffeine, or the amount of caffeine, so the consumer is left to guess. My grandpa Joe never dreamed of beer mixed with coffee or any other alcohol beverage that would perk him up.</p>

	<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/ws/ttb-not-ok-with-vitamin-wine" title="TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine (December 11, 2009)">TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/sparks-and-caffeine-nearly-extinguished" title="Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished (December 18, 2008)">Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished</a> (8)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/dss/serving-facts-on-bacardi-island-breeze" title="Serving Facts on Bacardi Island Breeze (March 10, 2009)">Serving Facts on Bacardi Island Breeze</a> (1)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/energy-beer/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Bull Vodka and Beer</title>
		<link>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/malt-beverage/red-bull-vodka-and-beer?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=red-bull-vodka-and-beer</link>
		<comments>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/malt-beverage/red-bull-vodka-and-beer#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[malt beverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vodka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caffeine/secondary effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/?p=2905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a wonder that Red Bull (of Austria) has not yet come out with with an alcohol beverage. It would be likely to be a smash, in that the product is so very popular as a mixer. Perhaps things are going so well with the energy drink that there is no need to mess with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/redbull.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2918" title="redbull" src="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/redbull.jpg" alt="redbull" width="500" height="320" /></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a wonder that <a href="http://www.redbullusa.com/">Red Bull</a> (of Austria) has not yet come out with with an alcohol beverage. It would be likely to be a smash, in that the product is so very popular as a mixer.</p>
<p>Perhaps things are going so well with the energy drink that there is no need to mess with it. But more likely, these two products beat the Austrians to the punch. Miller Brewing Company has approvals for <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/rbbeer.pdf">Red Bull Malt Liquor</a> going back at least as far as the early 1980s. Likewise, Majestic Distilling has approvals for <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/rbvodka.pdf">Red Bull Vodka</a> going back to 1990 or so.</p>
<p>This <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/bull.pdf">Dog Style Vodka</a> is one of the few TTB products to make explicit reference to the famous energy drink.</p>

	<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wine/hello-kitty-wine" title="Hello Kitty Wine (February 10, 2009)">Hello Kitty Wine</a> (7)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/absinthe/to-flame-or-not-czech-absinthe-hits-the-us" title="To Flame or Not: Czech Absinthe Hits the US (October 28, 2008)">To Flame or Not: Czech Absinthe Hits the US</a> (7)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fv/stolichnaya" title="Stolichnaya (March 29, 2011)">Stolichnaya</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/malt-beverage/red-bull-vodka-and-beer/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Caffeine</title>
		<link>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/dss/double-caffeine?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=double-caffeine</link>
		<comments>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/dss/double-caffeine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[distilled spirits specialty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flavored vodka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caffeine/secondary effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ingredients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/?p=2581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not content with simply adding coffee flavor to vodka, Vincent Van Gogh went further, all the way to &#8220;Double Caffeine.&#8221; Not so long ago, it was not clear that TTB would allow caffeine to be added to alcohol beverages, let alone to double it up and proclaim it on the label. Van Gogh coffee flavored [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2584" title="double" src="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/double.jpg" alt="double" width="500" height="500" /></p>
<p>Not content with simply adding coffee flavor to vodka, Vincent Van Gogh went further, all the way to &#8220;Double Caffeine.&#8221; Not so long ago, it was not clear that TTB would allow caffeine to be added to alcohol beverages, let alone to double it up and proclaim it on the label.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/double.pdf">Van Gogh</a> coffee flavored vodka is one of about <a href="http://vangoghvodka.com/index.html">18 flavored vodkas</a> made in Holland and imported by Luctor International of Orlando, Florida. The other caffeinated spirit above is <a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/volta.pdf">Volta</a>. It is Vodka Infused with Caffeine, Guarana, Taurine &amp; Yerba Mate, made by White Rock Distilleries of Lewiston, Maine.</p>
<p>Van Gogh Double Espressso is easy to find at retail, but Volta is less easy to find. All the extra caffeine may have gotten this retailer a bit over-excited; <a href="http://www.internetwines.com/rws32498.html">IWS describes it this way</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Double Intensity. Experience the finest tradition of Venice with the high art of great taste. &#8230; Delivers a wealth of flavor for those who expect more from their coffee &#8211; powerful yet sophisticated, with the stronger and richer character demanded by the espresso lover&#8217;s highly developed palate. Here is all the smooth brilliance of great caffé, in the only FDA-approved vodka on the market today with the bold touch of double caffeine.</p></blockquote>

	<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/ws/ttb-not-ok-with-vitamin-wine" title="TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine (December 11, 2009)">TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/sparks-and-caffeine-nearly-extinguished" title="Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished (December 18, 2008)">Sparks and Caffeine: Nearly Extinguished</a> (8)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/fmb/energy-beer" title="Energy Beer (August 3, 2009)">Energy Beer</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog/dss/double-caffeine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

