This fine product has eggs on the label, and in the bottle, so it comes equipped with an allergen qualification, on the approval. The above qualification says:

The disclosure of allergens used in this product is voluntary, pending final rulemaking (See Notice No. 62, 71 FR 42329). However; any reference made to allergens must declare all allergens used in the production of this product, including fining or processing agents.

And it is a harbinger of the allergen fun that is soon to commence. Soon, allergen disclosures will be mandatory on beer, wine and spirits. There is not much on the web or in the rules to explain how Advocaat should be made and where the name comes from, but the Bak’s label does a pretty good job. It explains that Bak’s Advocaat is made with potato spirits, egg yolk, sugar, vanilla and a bit of brandy.

Related Posts:

• Whey Neutral Spirits (0)
• Sucralose and Ace K (2)
• Serving Facts on Bacardi Island Breeze (1)

It is likely that all beer, wine and spirits labels will change dramatically in the near future. TTB Administrator John Manfreda confirmed this in a recent speech. TTB has been working on new rules since CSPI and other groups submitted a petition in 2003. The new rules would require a “Serving Facts” panel on every container. This panel would include a lot more information, such as the typical serving size, number of servings per container, calories, carbohydrates, protein and fat. Because this is a big, controversial change, TTB has received more than 18,000 public comments during the past few years. There are far too many comments for most people to review, and so we will highlight and summarize the most noteworthy comments here. The most recent proposal and comments are here. This is comment 22 in a series; to see others, click on the “serving facts” tag below.

13 Senators submitted a 2 page comment back in January of 2008. It said:

1. The proposed rule looks “methodical and careful,” for the most part.
2. It is time for TTB to require an alcohol content statement on beer, to be consistent with wine and spirits.
3. It is improper to show standard drinks by ounces or graphical depictions, whether optional or mandatory. They are complex and misleading.

Senator Dodd wrote separately, to say:

1. “I agree strongly with your proposal to require the listing of nutritional information on alcoholic beverages.”
2. Alcoholic beverages are the only food or beverage item for which standardized information is not readily available.
3. Standardized nutrition information, on labels, is “critically important.”
4. The rule should require labels to show the amount of alcohol per serving, in fluid ounces.
5. Labels should define “moderate drinking” and explain that a standard drink contains 0.6 fluid ounces of alcohol.
6. A standard drink would be 12 ounces of beer, 5 ounces of wine and 1.5 ounces of spirits.

Related Posts:

• WineAmerica Comment; Top 7 Things to Know (0)
• Wine Institute Comment; Top 7 Things to Know (4)
• The Washington Legal Foundation Comment; Top 6 Things to Know (0)

First there was Miller Lite, at about 96 calories per 12 ounces (back around 1975).

In later years the non-alcoholic malt beverages (or “near beers”) became more common, with leading brands such as Clausthaler and Kaliber at about 80 calories (as per Skilnik).

Now, in the past year, it appears we have a race to the bottom. That is, Miller Genuine Draft 64 came out about a year ago. It is, not surprisingly, 64 calories per 12 ounces (and 2.8% alc./vol.).

Lower and more recent still is Bud Select 55. It is only 55 calories and 2.4% alc./vol.

This is one important trend over the past 34 years. In a future post we will look at a countervailing trend toward very high calorie/alcohol malt beverages.

All of this leads us to wonder, where will this go in the next 34 years? When the Jonas Brothers hit middle age, will they be drinking Bud Exträ Epic Mega Select 11 (down near the lower limits for the legal definition of beer)? Hops flavored Perrier?

Related Posts:

• Beer with Oysters and Clams (3)
• Wine Without Pretense (0)
• Whey Neutral Spirits (0)

It is likely that all beer, wine and spirits labels will change dramatically in the near future. TTB Administrator John Manfreda confirmed this in a recent speech. TTB has been working on new rules since CSPI and other groups submitted a petition in 2003. The new rules would require a “Serving Facts” panel on every container. This panel would include a lot more information, such as the typical serving size, number of servings per container, calories, carbohydrates, protein and fat. Because this is a big, controversial change, TTB has received more than 18,000 public comments during the past few years. There are far too many comments for most people to review, and so we will highlight and summarize the most noteworthy comments here. The most recent proposal and comments are here. This is comment 21 in a series; to see others, click on the “serving facts” tag below.

Michael Taylor (on behalf of Diageo) submitted a 4 page comment. It said:

1. Diageo hired Mr. Taylor in 2005 and he’s currently a research professor at George Washington University. From 1991-1994 he was FDA’s Deputy Commissioner for Policy and was actively involved in setting the comparable rules for foods more generally.
2. I am disappointed that TTB will not require reference to a “standard drink.”
3. The Dietary Guidelines are an important tool and among other things they point out that moderate consumption of alcohol may convey health benefits.
4. It is wrong to argue that there is no “standard drink.” The concept can and should be used to avoid the need for consumers to make complex calculations at the point of purchase. It is similar to the % daily value concept successfully deployed by FDA.
5. “Any new alcohol label will have to be explained to consumers, and TTB should recognize that no new information tool on a consumer label achieves its full utility overnight or automatically.” TTB must preserve the “serving facts” concept and make it workable.

Related Posts:

• WineAmerica Comment; Top 7 Things to Know (0)
• Wine Institute Comment; Top 7 Things to Know (4)
• US Senate Comments; Top 9 Things to Know (2)

It is likely that all beer, wine and spirits labels will change dramatically in the near future. TTB has been working on new rules since CSPI and other groups submitted a petition in 2003. The new rules would require a “Serving Facts” panel on every container. This panel would include a lot more information, such as the typical serving size, number of servings per container, calories, carbohydrates, protein and fat. Because this is a big, controversial change, TTB has received more than 18,000 public comments during the past few years. There are far too many comments for most people to review, and so we will highlight and summarize the most noteworthy comments here. The most recent proposal and comments are here. This is comment 20 in a series; to see others, click on the “serving facts” tag below.

CSPI submitted a 10 page comment. It said:

1. CSPI has been pushing TTB and ATF on this since 1972.
2. Alcohol beverage labels offer few uniform disclosures to help consumers. Consumers deserve basic, uniform information that can help them “measure, monitor, and moderate their drinking.”
3. Alcohol is “America’s most popular, legal drug.”
4. TTB ignores more than 35 years of requests for ingredient labeling, and instead requires disclosure of rarely occurring nutrients such as fats and proteins. TTB should also require ingredient labeling.
5. CSPI is concerned that marketers will exploit the nutritional information to “hawk alcoholic beverages as diet or health drinks.”
6. CSPI strongly opposes the linear format except on 50 ml. containers.

Thirty five years into its marathon, and nearing the finish line, this article says CSPI is in dire financial circumstances.

Related Posts:

• WineAmerica Comment; Top 7 Things to Know (0)
• Wine Institute Comment; Top 7 Things to Know (4)
• US Senate Comments; Top 9 Things to Know (2)

Today we have two beers made with pecans (as opposed to pecan flavor). The Shiner Holiday Cheer is Ale Brewed with Peaches and Pecans. The 512 Pecan Porter is a Malt Beverage Brewed with Pecans. 512 is a microbrewery in Austin and apparently takes its name from the telephone area code. The owner explains that “brewing brings together both my passionate, creative side and my organized, controlled and diligent nature. Engineering + cooking: a real dream job!!”

Related Posts:

• Whey Neutral Spirits (0)
• Sucralose and Ace K (2)
• Serving Facts on Bacardi Island Breeze (1)

It is likely that all beer, wine and spirits labels will change dramatically in the near future. TTB has been working on new rules since CSPI and other groups submitted a petition in 2003. The new rules would require a “Serving Facts” panel on every container. This panel would include a lot more information, such as the typical serving size, number of servings per container, calories, carbohydrates, protein and fat. Because this is a big, controversial change, TTB has received more than 18,000 public comments during the past few years. There are far too many comments for most people to review, and so we will highlight and summarize the most noteworthy comments here. The most recent proposal and comments are here. This is comment 19 in a series; to see others, click on the “serving facts” tag below.

The staff of various offices within the Federal Trade Commission submitted a 16 page comment. It said:

1. The FTC staff “supports TTB’s proposal to increase substantially the amount of information contained on alcohol labels.”
2. TTB should require labels to disclose ounces of pure alcohol per serving, rather than alc./vol. This would allow consumers to compare servings of different drinks without doing mathematical calculations.
3. The FTC and TTB share jurisdiction over alcohol beverage labeling, and coordinate often.
4. About 65% of Americans drink alcohol.
5. The rule would “result in a substantial change in the appearance and content of alcohol labels.”

Related Posts:

• WineAmerica Comment; Top 7 Things to Know (0)
• Wine Institute Comment; Top 7 Things to Know (4)
• US Senate Comments; Top 9 Things to Know (2)

.

There is a lot going on at TTB, so it would be easy to lose track of allergens. Way back in 2005 TTB proposed to require allergens (such as nuts and milk) to be disclosed on all alcohol beverage labels. This would follow the 2004 law change for foods more generally. The final rule is due out someday soon, according to TTB’s Agenda. In the meantime, TTB is qualifying some approvals with the following language as on the above approvals:

The disclosure of allergens used in this product is voluntary, pending final rulemaking (See Notice No. 62, 71 FR 42329). However; any reference made to allergens must declare all allergens used in the production of this product, including fining or processing agents.

For those eager to get started, the 16-page proposal is here. O’Riley’s Cream Liqueur (link above) has milk products and a detailed ingredient list. DoReMi Cream Liqueur has about the same, plus nuts.

Related Posts:

• WineAmerica Comment; Top 7 Things to Know (0)
• Wine Institute Comment; Top 7 Things to Know (4)
• US Senate Comments; Top 9 Things to Know (2)

It is likely that all beer, wine and spirits labels will change dramatically in the near future. TTB has been working on new rules since CSPI and other groups submitted a petition in 2003. The new rules would require a “Serving Facts” panel on every container. This panel would include a lot more information, such as the typical serving size, number of servings per container, calories, carbohydrates, protein and fat. Because this is a big, controversial change, TTB has received more than 18,000 public comments during the past few years. There are far too many comments for most people to review, and so we will highlight and summarize the most noteworthy comments here. The most recent proposal and comments are here. This is comment 18 in a series; to see others, click on the “serving facts” tag below.

NABI is the National Association of Beverage Importers. It is a trade association whose members produce, import and distribute alcohol beverage products. Its three page comment said:

1. The manner of presenting the information should be optional and depend on the space available.
2. For example, a linear format may be suitable in some cases and in others the company could provide the information via a website.
3. The rule is complex especially in combination with state and international rules, and allergen labeling.

The Presidents’ Forum of the Beverage Alcohol Industry is a trade association made up of US alcohol beverage company CEOs. Its two page comment said:

1. This should be voluntary rather than mandatory.
2. A toll free phone number or website could serve the same purpose.
3. Or, a linear format is sufficient.
4. As companies phase-in the serving facts panel, they should be allowed to do so without seeking new label approvals. This would ease the burden on industry and “reduce the need to review a vast number of already approved labels that no doubt would strain [TTB's] already scarce resources.”

Related Posts:

• WineAmerica Comment; Top 7 Things to Know (0)
• Wine Institute Comment; Top 7 Things to Know (4)
• US Senate Comments; Top 9 Things to Know (2)

It is likely that all beer, wine and spirits labels will change dramatically in the near future. TTB has been working on new rules since CSPI and other groups submitted a petition in 2003. The new rules would require a “Serving Facts” panel on every container. This panel would include a lot more information, such as the typical serving size, number of servings per container, calories, carbohydrates, protein and fat. Because this is a big, controversial change, TTB has received more than 18,000 public comments during the past few years. There are far too many comments for most people to review, and so we will highlight and summarize the most noteworthy comments here. The most recent proposal and comments are here. This is comment 17 in a series; to see others, click on the “serving facts” tag below.

Representatives Mike Thompson (D-CA 1st) and George Radanovich (R-Mariposa) are co-chairmen of the Congressional Wine Caucus. Their 2-page comment said:

1. This rule “could lead to the most significant revisions in wine label requirements in the history of the American wine industry.”
2. It could “have a severely detrimental impact on the wine industry.”
3. There is little evidence that consumers want or need additional information of this type, and TTB should balance this against the burden.
4. TTB should make it voluntary, or allow the use of typical values rather than analytical values.
5. The burdens are unreasonable. They could “easily reach into the hundreds of thousands of dollars for a medium sized winery.”

Related Posts:

• WineAmerica Comment; Top 7 Things to Know (0)
• Wine Institute Comment; Top 7 Things to Know (4)
• US Senate Comments; Top 9 Things to Know (2)